Related by context. All words. (Click for frequent words.) 78 Defendant asserts 77 Appellant argues 74 Defendant contends 73 Defendant argues 72 appellant contends 72 Appellant contends 71 appellant asserts 71 Petitioner argues 71 appellants contend 71 Appellants argue 71 JNOV motion 70 Appellants contend 69 w hether 69 p laintiff 69 Petitioner contends 68 § #-#.# [002] 68 Plaintiff Complaint 68 Respondent concedes 68 curative instruction 67 CrR #.# 67 Petitioner asserts 67 habeas petitioner 67 contemporaneous objection 67 Fla. 2d DCA 67 arguable merit 67 unanimity instruction 67 Fla. 3d DCA 67 Rule #:#-# [002] 67 Appellants assert 67 mootness 67 assuming arguendo 67 appellant 67 e vidence 66 facially invalid 66 Plaintiff contends 66 5th DCA 66 overbreadth 66 procedurally barred 66 Plaintiff asserts 66 CALJIC No. #.# 66 Appellant 66 Spreigl evidence 65 procedurally defaulted 65 factually distinguishable 65 preclude summary judgment 65 posttrial 65 c ourt 65 parol evidence 65 judgment nunc pro 65 reviewed de novo 65 NJRE 65 sua sponte duty 65 d efendant 65 proximate causation 65 coram nobis 65 sua sponte dismissal 64 Respondent contends 64 posttrial motion 64 D efendant 64 UCBR 64 substantive unreasonableness 64 factual predicate 64 b ecause 64 constitutionally deficient 64 scrivener error 64 Opening Br 64 procedural reasonableness 64 d efendants 64 Evid. Code § 64 Collateral estoppel 64 procedurally defective 64 Construing 64 § #-# [001] 64 Assuming arguendo 64 equitable estoppel 64 Aplt 64 Younger abstention 64 Movants 64 colorable 63 conclusory assertion 63 judicial estoppel 63 RCr #.# 63 colorable claim 63 reasonable factfinder 63 nonfrivolous 63 § #-#-# [006] 63 nonjurisdictional 63 procedural unconscionability 63 unduly prejudicial 63 Third Amended Complaint 63 sua sponte 63 § #C#.# 63 Section #.#.# [001] 63 postconviction counsel 63 u pon 63 bsent 63 Faretta motion 63 nontestimonial 63 conclusively establishes 63 res gestae 63 section #.#.# 63 preclusive effect 63 4th DCA 63 ref'd 63 Title VII retaliation 63 mens rea requirement 63 Faretta 63 ResQNet 63 error coram nobis 63 hereby DENIED 62 § #-#.# [003] 62 La.Civ.Code art 62 Evidence Code 62 Pa.RAP 62 habeas proceeding 62 OCGA § #-#-# [001] 62 ORS #.# [001] 62 CAFA jurisdiction 62 OCGA § #-#-# [007] 62 instruct sua sponte 62 uncharged misconduct 62 CALCRIM 62 mere scintilla 62 reh'g 62 precluded summary judgment 62 § #A [001] 62 postconviction motion 62 § #.# [003] 62 jurisdictional prerequisite 62 Tennard 62 RC #.# [002] 62 uncontradicted 62 Rule #:#-# [001] 62 WISCONSIN STAT 62 postjudgment 62 claim preclusion 62 Reply Brief 62 assume arguendo 62 TCA § #-#-# [003] 62 summarily affirm 62 nondischargeability 62 mistake inadvertence surprise 62 court prejudicially erred 62 Defendant 62 hearsay objection 61 Appellants 61 USSG § #G#.# 61 procedurally unreasonable 61 Hofsheier 61 vacatur 61 Fed.R.Civ.P. 61 liberally construe 61 Code Civ 61 appellant contentions 61 Defendant Scrushy 61 reh'g denied 61 movants 61 additur 61 facially insufficient 61 Munkelt 61 factual underpinnings 61 i fa 61 lenity 61 Plaintiffs contend 61 exculpatory clause 61 § #.#.# [001] 61 interrogatory responses 61 counsel performed deficiently 61 appellants 61 extrinsic evidence 61 § #A [002] 61 ore tenus 61 corpus delicti rule 61 factual determinations 61 affiants 61 accused infringer 61 #.# subdivision [002] 61 postconviction 61 KSA #-# [002] 61 De Varon 61 unpreserved 61 Pitchess motion 61 Ibid. 61 § #-# [002] 61 § #-#-# [002] 61 indefiniteness 61 Movant 60 coram nobis relief 60 JNOV 60 Code § #.#-# [001] 60 Petitioner 60 Faretta v. California 60 justiciable controversy 60 Plaintiff 60 contemnor 60 issue preclusion 60 uncharged offenses 60 P laintiff 60 IC § #-# 60 CALCRIM Nos. 60 RCW #.#A.# 60 OCGA § #-#-# [004] 60 reversible error 60 Double Jeopardy Clause 60 postconviction relief 60 manifestly unreasonable 60 SLUSA 60 parental unfitness 60 plea colloquy 60 prejudice prong 60 gross disproportionality 60 f ailure 60 Minn. Stat 60 factual sufficiency 60 u nless 60 RC #.# B [002] 60 postconviction petition 60 postjudgment interest 60 Reinholtsen 60 USSG § 60 conclusory allegation 60 equitable subrogation 60 dispositive motion 60 No. #AP 60 dism'd 60 § #-#-# [004] 60 People v. Gardeley 60 ORS #B.# 60 nonappealable 60 res ipsa 60 Mr. Narmont 60 KSA #-# [001] 60 c ounsel 60 interlocutory appeals 60 #.# subdivision [004] 59 untimeliness 59 evidentiary rulings 59 P laintiffs 59 C ourt 59 uncontradicted testimony 59 procedural irregularity 59 s uch 59 State ex rel 59 parol evidence rule 59 postconviction proceedings 59 uncontroverted facts 59 manifestly unsupported 59 fraudulent joinder 59 incurably defective 59 n othing 59 argument unpersuasive 59 Appellate Term 59 wholly unsupported 59 establishes prima facie 59 § #A.# 59 remittitur 59 internal quotation omitted 59 postconviction proceeding 59 Crim.R. 59 Solicitor Chrissy Adams 59 substantive unconscionability 59 Claimant argues 59 misapprehends 59 § 7A 59 mootness doctrine 59 condemnor 59 Restatement § 59 presumptively prejudicial 59 IJ erred 59 CrR 59 Ex parte Young 59 OCGA § #-#-#.# 59 nonsuit 59 Hodari D. 59 raise triable 59 Repl. 59 lodestar method 59 NJSA #:#-# [002] 59 La. RS #:# [002] 59 App.R. 59 GL c 59 substantively unconscionable 59 PS § 59 legally cognizable 59 CPLR 59 nonfinal 59 tunc 59 mens rea element 59 C ounsel 59 section #-#-# [002] 59 promissory fraud 59 Rooker Feldman doctrine 59 Ben Massar Finley 59 w ithout 58 Compl. ¶ 58 Dkt. # 58 internal quotations omitted 58 subsection c 58 § 7B 58 § #-#-# [001] 58 unduly prejudiced 58 section #.# subdivision 58 reasonable inferences drawn 58 articulable 58 postjudgment motion 58 WCJ 58 Plaintiffs assert 58 testimonial hearsay 58 mem. op 58 § #B#.# [002] 58 E vidence 58 overrule appellant 58 OCGA § #-#-# [008] 58 unliquidated damages 58 ex mero motu 58 Munby J 58 Wis. Stat 58 People v. Carmony 58 conclusory 58 defendant 58 limine 58 JMOL 58 controverting 58 inadmissible hearsay 58 § #.# [001] 58 waives sovereign immunity 58 § #-# [003] 58 substantively unreasonable 58 habeas relief 58 irrebuttable 58 merely voidable 58 Rooker Feldman 58 conclusions de novo 58 subsection d 58 La.RS #:#.# [001] 58 Wyo. Stat 58 p rior 58 multiplicitous 58 undue prejudice 58 permissibly 58 Petitioners contend 58 declarants 58 conclusory statements 58 adjudicating guilt 58 propria persona 58 Idaho Code § 58 jurisdictional defect 58 § #-#-# [003] 58 Evid.R. 58 Compl. 58 improvidently granted 58 Rosenkrantz supra 58 sub nom 58 assertedly 58 patently frivolous 58 Plaintiffs Complaint 58 plainly erred 58 facially valid 58 CALCRIM No. 58 Appellate Division affirmed 58 prima facia 58 determinations de novo 58 CAFC reversed 58 pp. #-# fn 58 footnotes omitted 58 posttrial motions 58 #-# SDNY 58 CFR § #.# [005] 58 Presentence Report 58 Penal Code Sec 58 factually unsupported 58 plainly erroneous 58 appellees 58 RCr 58 KSA #-# d 58 sufficient indicia 58 nonfrivolous issue 58 Res judicata 58 averment 57 movant 57 NJSA 2A #A 57 Pen. Code § #.# [001] 57 Relators 57 quotation omitted 57 Jury Instruction 57 facially unconstitutional 57 collaterally attack 57 § #-#.# [001] 57 Claimant contends 57 NDNY 57 obiter 57 antenuptial agreement 57 credibility determinations 57 replead 57 Even assuming arguendo 57 OCGA § #-#-# [005] 57 probative value 57 factfinder 57 RC #.# B [001] 57 foreseeability 57 Judgments § 57 arbitrability 57 conclusory allegations 57 hereby DISMISSED 57 section #-#-# [003] 57 c ourts 57 Dismiss Plaintiff 57 ORS #A.# 57 order sustaining demurrer 57 estoppel 57 w hen 57 Id. 57 res ipsa loquitur 57 nonmovant 57 constituted inadmissible hearsay 57 hereby GRANTED 57 Assistant Appellate Defender 57 Civ.R. 57 section #.# 57 promissory estoppel claim 57 uncharged misconduct evidence 57 factual contentions 57 CAFC affirmed 57 Cal. App 57 Eleventh Circuit affirmed 57 requisite mens rea 57 SCR #:#.# [001] 57 p laintiffs 57 Rule #-# 57 adduce evidence 57 NYCHRL 57 prejudicially affected 57 Doc. # 57 factually insufficient 57 punctuation omitted 57 L.Ed. 2d 57 § #.# [004] 57 conclusory assertions 57 caselaw 57 Amended Judgment 57 nonobviousness 57 Cal. Rules 57 Gen. Stat 57 Ark. R. Civ 57 Equitable tolling 57 evidentiary objections 57 awardable 57 Manzy W. 57 CUTPA 57 interlocutory orders 57 Boykin Tahl 57 Bedkes 57 Colo. Sess 57 collaterally estopped 57 NJSA 2C :2 57 prosecutorial impropriety 57 Declaratory Judgment Act 57 Supp. 57 bindover 57 § #E#.# 57 § #.# subd [005] 57 nolo contendere plea 57 Kestenband 57 unconscionability 56 equitably tolled 56 Probate Code 56 IRCP 56 promissory estoppel 56 Judge Monti Belot 56 Judge Dyk 56 Doc. 56 interrogatory 56 La. RS #:# [003] 56 s ection 56 § #a [002] 56 quantum meruit 56 USSG § #B#.# [002] 56 compulsory counterclaim 56 Confrontation Clause 56 pp. #-# italics 56 ARS § #-# [001] 56 u nder 56 habeas corpus proceeding 56 ADJUDGED 56 NRS #.# [001] 56 granting appellee 56 § #-#-# [008] 56 hereby AFFIRMED 56 evidence adduced 56 constituted willful misconduct 56 Portley El 56 writ ref'd nre 56 dispositive 56 n.9 56 dispositional order 56 § #A#.# 56 peremptory writ 56 objectively verifiable 56 USSG § #D#.# 56 uncontroverted testimony 56 interrogatory answers 56 IT IS ORDERED 56 § #c 56 IJ adverse 56 affirmative misrepresentation 56 misapprehended 56 manifest disregard 56 § #.# b 56 evidentiary 56 mandamus proceeding 56 granting summary judgment 56 C ourts 56 inferable 56 unexhausted 56 disclose exculpatory evidence 56 inapposite 56 § #.# [002] 56 Rimpa Haldhar 56 § #.# [006] 56 reasonably arguable 56 g enerally 56 footnote omitted 56 nunc pro tunc 56 b ased upon 56 ¶ 56 KRS #.# [003] 56 Eleventh Circuits 56 interlocutory judgment 56 Pitchess discovery 56 particularity requirement 56 nonfrivolous issues 56 legally protectable 56 Appellate Division reversed 56 preclusion 56 surrebuttal 56 Civil Procedure Rule 56 § #-#-#.# 56 Safeco Ins 56 ¶ ¶ 56 Steve Verby 56 Judge Bruce Romanick 56 WCJ erred 56 misapplies 56 Elias Zacarias 56 plea allocution 56 #.# subd [006] 56 Due Process Clause 56 appealable interlocutory 56 Code § #-#.# 56 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 56 WCAB 56 prosecution laches 56 excusable neglect 56 Urdangen 56 controvert 56 dispositional orders 56 obiter dictum 56 dkt item 56 RCW #.#.# [004] 56 relator 56 Ohio Adm.Code #-#-# 56 presumptively unconstitutional 56 id. 56 internal citation omitted 56 errata sheet 56 supersedeas 56 Dkt. 56 construing statute 56 petitioner 56 Rule XIX 56 #.# subds [001] 56 presumptively unreasonable 55 reasonable inferences therefrom 55 CFR § #.# [006] 55 adequately pled 55 Judgment affirmed 55 simpliciter 55 nonprecedential 55 NJSA 2C :# 1a 55 appealability 55 CPLR article 55 Their Lordships 55 DEFENSE COUNSEL 55 Judge Sprizzo 55 Second Amended Complaint 55 numerosity 55 corpus delicti 55 PCRA petition 55 OCGA § #-#-# [003] 55 Judge Sabraw 55 Minn. R. Civ 55 Tennessee Code Annotated 55 involuntary intoxication 55 Civil Procedure section 55 w hile 55 Proximate cause 55 inapplicable 55 draw reasonable inferences 55 evidential burden 55 g iven 55 qui tam relator 55 OCGA § #-#-# [002] 55 ALJ erred 55 DC Code § 55 Prospective Juror No. 55 mere surplusage 55 non justiciable 55 REMANDED 55 surely unattributable 55 substantive reasonableness 55 e ach 55 RCW #A.#.# [002] 55 grievant 55 Attorney Doron Weinberg 55 section #.#b 55 severability 55 Judge Gertner 55 evidence preponderates 55 certif 55 manifestly erroneous 55 voire dire 55 intermediate appellate 55 '# patent invalid 55 Sentencing Guidelines Manual 55 affirmance 55 Defendant pled guilty 55 estoppel certificate 55 presentence credits 55 lawmaker Hosseini Sobhaninia 55 Slip op 55 Pa.CS § 55 Johnson v. Eisentrager 55 expressly disavowed 55 § #B#.# [001] 55 Reasonable suspicion 55 estop 55 negligent entrustment 55 Undisputed Facts 55 ULJ 55 contemporaneous objection rule 55 habeas statute 55 RSMo 55 #AP# CR 55 No. #CA# [002] 55 appellee 55 Voir dire 55 1st DCA 55 interlocutory appeal 55 affd 55 § #D#.# b 55 postrelease control 55 Subsection c 55 latent defect 55 Eleventh Circuit 55 WDNY 55 State Farm Mut 55 CALJIC 55 WITH PREJUDICE 55 Internal quotation marks 55 Apprendi 55 Evid. Code § § 55 Restatement Second 55 Melendez Diaz 55 anti SLAPP motion 55 equitable subordination 55 section #-#-# [001] 55 JUSTICE SCALIA 55 v. Cavera 55 People v. Waidla 55 Cal. Const 55 voir dire examination 55 crossexamination 55 Trustee Objection 55 anti SLAPP statute 55 factual predicates 55 v. Quarterman 55 indemnitor 55 La. RS #:# [001] 55 unadjudicated 55 Ex Post Facto 55 No. #CA# M 55 adduce sufficient 55 Allendoerfer 55 requestor petitioner 55 Justice Bhunu 55 precedential 55 Adversary Proceeding 55 Dkt. No. 54 inculpatory 54 subsection f 54 ICWA notice 54 collateral estoppel 54 MR Civ 54 Judge Ingrid Uhler 54 doc. # 54 agrees Sinema 54 ED Tex. 54 rebuttable 54 appelate court 54 § #A [003] 54 causal nexus 54 controverting evidence 54 intentional relinquishment 54 Civ. Code § 54 § #K#.# b 54 impermissibly suggestive 54 La. Code Civ 54 scienter requirement 54 Ravinder Dudeja 54 damages proximately caused 54 justiciability 54 mandamus petition 54 Docket # 54 noninfringement 54 Judge Stanwood Duval 54 Pa.CSA § 54 § #.# subd [002] 54 contributorily negligent 54 Wallace Hoggatt 54 CFR § #.# [003] 54 Justice Omerjee 54 intentional misstatement 54 n.4 54 Doganiere 54 § #K#.# 54 prosecutorial vindictiveness 54 UIFSA 54 Alan H. Perer 54 n.5 54 fortiori 54 KRS #.# [002] 54 KRS #.# [001] 54 § #.# subd [001] 54 averments 54 ex parte application 54 purposeful availment 54 CFR § #.# [004] 54 RC #.# F 54 joint tortfeasors 54 #-# citations omitted 54 Injunctive relief 54 Lord Glennie 54 alteration omitted 54 Tenn. R. Civ 54 Gen. Elec 54 Memorandum Opinion 54 midtrial 54 contractual indemnity 54 affiant 54 No. CA# 54 drawn therefrom 54 OCGA § #-#-# [006] 54 presumptively valid 54 Plaintiff alleges 54 Prospective Juror 54 subsection h 54 Berghuis v. Thompkins 54 Justice Kathryn Mickle 54 purely circumstantial 54 Almendarez Torres 54 Rule #:#-# b 54 internal citations omitted 54 Niemoczynski 54 ND Tex. 54 § #.#.# [002] 54 Zuma Thint 54 WD Tex. 54 Suspension Clause 54 2d Dept 54 defendants appellees 54 factual assertions 54 procedurally flawed 54 pari delicto 54 warrantless seizure 54 Dkt 54 Ohio Adm.Code 54 2d Dep't 54 Mohamad Zabidin 54 Justice Jamadar 54 severability provision 54 NDCC § 54 LBR #-# 54 equitable tolling 54 Bataillon 54 probative 54 plaintiffs appellants 54 inferences therefrom 54 Evid 54 controverted 54 cognizable 54 creates rebuttable presumption 54 § #e 54 USC § #e 54 b Vernon Supp 54 USCA § 54 mens rea 54 precedential value 54 ex parte communication 54 Appellees 54 R. #:#-# 54 nonjusticiable 54 liquidated damages clause 54 LSA RS #:# [002] 54 appealable judgment 54 pro hac vice 54 Miss. Ct 54 laches 54 App'x 54 Appellate Procedure 54 AEDPA statute 54 La.Code Civ.P. art 54 knowingly intelligently 54 § #B#.# b 54 Rossanese 54 statutory aggravators 54 pretermitted 54 void ab initio 54 Saranchak 53 Pa. Code § 53 accusatory instrument 53 Hlophe JP 53 #-# Ala. Civ 53 ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED 53 subsection b 53 USC § #a [001] 53 lv dismissed 53 NJSA 2C :# 3a 53 e xcept 53 Fam. Code § 53 USSG § #A#.# b 53 Judge Augello 53 USC § #A 53 VSA § 53 Respondent 53 #.# subd [002] 53 AEDPA 53 triable 53 Appellate Panel 53 La.RS #:# [003] 53 nonparties 53 Ala. Crim 53 Judge Nordheimer 53 respectfully submits 53 personam jurisdiction 53 res judicata 53 nonstatutory 53 Torts § 53 Charles Hely 53 Relator 53 plead scienter 53 ARS § #-# [002] 53 impaneling jury 53 Defendants assert 53 AS #.#.# 53 interpleader 53 McCurn 53 Celotex Corp. 53 Judicial Proceedings Article 53 KRS #A.# [002] 53 willful misrepresentation 53 DR #-# 53 retrograde extrapolation 53 Ms Justice Laffoy 53 Allvoice 53 summary affirmance 53 Richard Kubilus 53 habeas proceedings 53 Xiu Xia Lin 53 OOR 53 Bilski patent 53 Doc. No. 53 factfinding 53 Contempt Order 53 Gripon 53 2d Cir.# 53 impermissibly vague 53 Justice Cowdroy 53 aggravator 53 Wettick 53 Intervenor 53 VACATE 53 NJSA 2A :# 53 NYCRR #.# [002] 53 precluding summary judgment 53 Furfure 53 NJSA #:#-#.# [002] 53 S ection 53 Presentence Investigation Report 53 redetermine 53 NCGS § #A 53 BPAI 53 remanding 53 appelate 53 9th Cir.# 53 intentional concealment 53 affidavits depositions 53 § #D#.# 53 Arkansas Code Annotated 53 hypertechnical 53 Eckiss 53 ALJ 53 attained finality 53 arguments unpersuasive 53 Justice Kathryn Werdegar 53 No. #CA# [001] 53 § #G#.# 53 Justice Jaynee LaVecchia 53 #B#.# 53 La.Code Crim.P. art 53 § #-#-# c [001] 53 KSA #-# b 53 Geier supra 53 objectively unreasonable 53 Resp't 53 Eagloski 53 Amended Complaint 53 t hese 53 Judge Bonnie Sabraw 53 ripeness doctrine 53 bona fide purchaser 53 n.# 9th Cir 53 NYCRR #.# [001] 53 ZHB 53 v. Shatzer 53 Docket Nos. 53 Code § #.#-#.# [001] 53 retroactivity provision 53 HRS § #-# [001] 53 allocution 53 ll.# 53 People v. Falsetta 53 unexhausted claims 53 USSG § #C#.# 53 affirmative defenses 53 gravamen 53 O'Scannlain 53 Waidla 53 See id 53 reweigh 53 unrefuted 53 Vernon Supp 53 voluntariness 53 Exercising jurisdiction 53 wholly unpersuasive 53 patently unreasonable 53 See USSG § #B#.# 53 f ederal 53 equitable indemnity 53 NJSA 2C :5 53 NJSA #:#-#.# [001] 53 deportability 53 Broncos Perrish Cox 53 Punitive damages penalize 53 § #-#-# [005] 53 reargument 53 personam 53 People v. Breverman 53 sanctionable conduct 53 People v. Doganiere 53 IC § 53 Defendant Siegelman 53 OCGA § 53 AND ADJUDGED 53 Fireman Fund Ins 53 e ven 53 REMAND 53 limine motions 53 impermissibly infringe 53 percipient witness 53 ORS #.# [002] 53 sole proximate cause 53 n.7 53 Judge Maraman 53 Appellant Br 53 USC § #o 52 actus reus 52 BIA denial 52 § #.# [005] 52 Personnel Bd 52 § #L#.# 52 Exigent circumstances 52 Denkowski 52 Judge Scheindlin 52 wholly misrepresents 52 temporal proximity 52 demurrer 52 En banc 52 IC § § 52 Code § # 52 impugned judgment 52 uncontroverted evidence 52 ARS § 52 Justice Christopher Dietzen 52 pro se litigant 52 pari materia 52 Liberty Mut 52 § #a [001] 52 IIRIRA 52 Daniel Manry