argu ment

Related by string. argument * Arguing . arguing . Argued . argued . ARGUS . arguer . ARGUED . argus : Argus Observer blogs . Don Argus . Wales Argus Newsdesk . Sioux Falls Argus . designated Argus Observer . Argus Courier . Argus Observer furnishes . argued strenuously / Menter . Menting . Ment . MENT . mented . ments . m ent : Manage ment . develop ment . invest ments . entertain ment . Move ment . equip ment . docu ments * *

Related by context. All words. (Click for frequent words.) 50 argument 47 conclusory statements 46 instruct sua sponte 46 Joran supposedly 45 recklessly indifferent 45 Mr Sofronoff 45 Justice Venning 44 arguments 44 Judge Joanna Seybert 44 uncharged misconduct evidence 44 Cirincion 44 parol evidence 44 recantations 43 Robin Heidt 43 Buntion 43 Judge Cabranes 43 uncharged offenses 43 argu ments 43 Plaintiff Complaint 43 Urdangen 43 assertion 43 Lord Glennie 43 scurrilous accusation 43 Grommek 43 thimerosal autism 43 Dalla Vedova 43 recusal motion 42 Mrs Jarmyn 42 Malloth appeal 42 nonjusticiable 42 Kalokathis 42 Mr Pithouse 42 p laintiff 42 Myambo 42 postconviction counsel 42 Grunander 42 Pillets 42 substantive unreasonableness 42 nolo contendere plea 42 e vidence 42 factual assertions 42 unduly prejudicial 42 mens rea requirement 42 Younger abstention 42 Appellant asserts 42 completely counterproductive Haferbeck 42 Title VII retaliation 42 Zuma Thint 42 uncredible 41 Ahto 41 Defendant asserts 41 Refowich 41 Mr. Narmont 41 impanel jury 41 JNOV motion 41 Prosecutor Jeffery Strelzin 41 P laintiffs 41 Vernail 41 Judge Dyk 41 Judge Thomas Zonay 41 jury venire 41 Mohamad Zabidin 41 retry Tice 41 arguments unpersuasive 41 procedural unconscionability 41 Victim Impact Statement 41 procedural unfairness 41 pleadings liberally 41 incriminatory statements 41 procedurally improper 41 Filomena Tobias 41 uncontradicted testimony 41 Concourt judges 41 Munkelt 40 objectively verifiable 40 defendant 40 evidential basis 40 Marthage 40 Bucklo 40 assertedly 40 Judge Nordheimer 40 Glucksberg 40 tu quoque 40 Kutmus 40 Pikoli suspension 40 d efendant 40 Dr. Julian Gojer 40 arguement 40 accusation 40 Judge Benotto 40 justiciable controversy 40 disprovable 40 aquittal 40 Bilski patent 40 Dassey confession 40 Justice Hedigan 40 Allendoerfer 40 Wilutis 40 Dunphy Farris 40 birther conspiracy 40 Warme 40 Boykin Tahl 40 mem. op 40 precluding summary judgment 40 Justice Margot Botsford 40 reasonable inferences therefrom 40 Broscius 40 Suntag 40 procedural irregularity 40 Concourt 40 Judge Doogue 40 conflicting inferences 40 PCRA petition 40 Monsue 40 Wymard 40 Izinyon 40 precluded summary judgment 40 wholly unsupported 40 Arlan Briggs 40 codefendant 40 DeVesa 40 appellant 40 Judge Samuel Sferrazza 39 complaintant 39 inferences therefrom 39 Udashen 39 patently frivolous 39 dissenting opinion 39 D efendant 39 Peter G. Verniero 39 coram nobis relief 39 agrument 39 curative instruction 39 Reinholtsen 39 uncontroverted testimony 39 corpus delicti rule 39 Prospective Juror No. 39 emotionally distraught Deratany 39 quasi judicial immunity 39 Sabbota 39 testamentary capacity 39 uncharged misconduct 39 Mohamed Azmin 39 Soshnick 39 factual contentions 39 Hlophe JP 39 contentions 39 Saranchak 39 Petitioner asserts 39 plausible inference 39 Horngrad 39 Spreigl evidence 39 allegation 39 inculpatory evidence 39 cultural relativist 39 Judge Tom Varlan 39 equitable subordination 39 Wettick 39 Bertani Tomczak 39 feds Eberhart 39 Judge Tatel 39 Tennard 39 IRS Zashin says 39 affidavit 39 fallacious argument 39 sharply worded dissent 39 dissenting justices 39 attorney Demetrius Fannick 39 Mumbuna 39 colorable claim 39 Justice Steven Rares 39 Latoracca 39 Judge Ambro 39 DPP Keir Starmer 39 Gamez Acuna 39 Dowgul 39 Stepmother Teresa Earnhardt 39 hypertechnical 39 Fastow adamantly 39 judge Emmet Sullivan 39 Constitution Supremacy Clause 39 Bratara called 39 admissability 39 rhetorical hyperbole 39 Klebuc 39 Washington v. Glucksberg 39 audi alteram partem 39 antenuptial agreement 39 uncorroborated testimony 38 factual underpinnings 38 deliberate falsehood 38 non justiciable 38 posttrial motion 38 Ribitwer 38 Yavorcik 38 Erwin Siregar 38 exculpatory clause 38 nondischargeability 38 ideological dogma 38 overbreadth 38 prejudice prong 38 unfortunate DuPaix 38 testimony 38 bindover 38 Paul Mabey QC 38 Freeborne 38 attorney Hank Coxe 38 wise Latina remark 38 Appellate Division affirmed 38 NEJM editorial 38 Mr Ciancosi 38 Ligus 38 Justice Russell Juriansz 38 strawman arguments 38 uncontradicted 38 counterargument 38 Father Goodall 38 reasonable factfinder 38 misapprehends 38 appellant asserts 38 factually distinguishable 38 plea allocution 38 affiants 38 reargument 38 ipse dixit 38 Fayed conspiracy theories 38 Annie Jarmyn 38 perjure himself 38 coerced confession 38 draw reasonable inferences 38 Liazan Molina Rodriguez 38 Ms Justice Laffoy 38 malafides 38 Eleanor Adderley 38 unmitigated liar 38 unsupported assertions 38 Pleicones 38 Defendant argues 38 mother Shamima Kausar 38 Judge Bozalek 38 bsent 38 inculpatory 38 Justice Baragwanath 38 assertions 38 lawyer Edward MacMahon 38 Hofsheier 38 OLC memoranda 38 plaintiffs appellants 38 Probation revocation 38 movant 38 controverting evidence 38 postconviction motion 38 reasonably arguable 38 5th DCA 38 Regolas 38 withheld exculpatory evidence 38 Kevin Musolf 38 dissent Justice Antonin 38 perjurious testimony 38 Ben Massar Finley 38 refutable 38 Sarrazin cites 38 res gestae 38 inculpatory statements 38 AIDS denialists 38 Ferencek 38 Movants 38 causal nexus 38 Justice Menis Ketchum 38 overborne 38 attorney Vicki Podberesky 38 CAFA jurisdiction 38 Fla. 2d DCA 38 CALCRIM 38 Gribble insanity 38 negatives Howman 38 Judge Sprizzo 38 Scalia dissented 38 Griders 38 Judge Augello 38 vindictive prosecution 38 outright falsehood 38 negligent misstatement 38 Justice Joyce Kennard 38 Respondent contends 38 defendant Dritan Duka 38 Rusty Hardin Victoria Osteen 38 blatant falsehood 38 Wuterich lance corporals 37 CrR #.# 37 unanimity instruction 37 habeas proceeding 37 adversarial proceeding 37 fallacious arguments 37 Mr Kilach 37 Audra Dowler 37 Judge Czajka 37 Hildwin 37 postconviction proceeding 37 Watcheston 37 Dame Sian 37 Ms Jarmyn 37 attorney Jeffrey Jakmides 37 conclusory assertions 37 unconstitutionally discriminatory 37 Collateral estoppel 37 proximate causation 37 Lario Munoz 37 videotaped confessions 37 involuntarily intoxicated 37 provable facts 37 pro se litigant 37 fallacious logic 37 Merino Apolinar 37 Paul V. Niemeyer 37 prosecutor Lisa Gamoian 37 overgeneralization 37 Petitioner contends 37 mere puffery 37 Lord Pannick 37 legitimate penological interests 37 peers Gantman 37 Dolores Troiani 37 Kobagaya attorneys 37 procedural reasonableness 37 neo Darwinism 37 misogynist Pingelton 37 Von Zamft 37 Botary 37 Ruffin Brand 37 Johnson v. Eisentrager 37 Mr Rwakoojo 37 Treppiedi 37 John Nuchereno 37 Ms Aikins 37 exculpates 37 Petitioner argues 37 prosecutor Shellie Samuels 37 majoritarianism 37 Mr Shervill 37 specious reasoning 37 nonfrivolous 37 Clinton feeler 37 merited reprimand 37 Mr Bellanto 37 al Qasa 37 Paul Freeborne 37 Appellant 37 prosecutorial zeal 37 Zelechiwsky 37 habeas corpus proceeding 37 assuming arguendo 37 attorney Rocco Cipparone 37 procedural technicalities 37 blamelessness 37 substantive unconscionability 37 fiscal soundness dampens 37 complainant 37 Zonay 37 contemporaneous objection 37 Gail Pamukov 37 factually deficient 37 Difenderfer 37 Mr Mutembei 37 exigent circumstance 37 Pailca 37 Mrs McGarrigle 37 Faretta motion 37 methodological flaws 37 mere scintilla 37 Ronald Rompilla 37 Van Iveren 37 alarmist rhetoric 37 Mallano 37 Ann Vanstone 37 judicial estoppel 37 Lt. Col. Vandeveld 37 incontrovertible facts 37 equitable subrogation 37 cogent arguments 37 Swanum 37 blatant untruth 37 unsubstantiated allegation 37 opinion concurring 37 nonfactual 37 Ms Izevbekhai 37 Ms Milledge 37 Mr Algie 37 unsubstantiated assertions 37 Judge Julia Aurigemma 37 marital coercion 37 Justice Kuewumi 37 arguements 37 Rompilla 37 accused infringer 37 allega tions 37 Mugging robbery 37 Picicco 37 concurring opinions 37 Mr. Esrabian 37 JUSTICE SCALIA 37 Kapsak 37 Kalitowski 37 Opening Br 37 Shenna Grimm 37 Ms. Pechaluk 37 surrebuttal 37 minitrial 37 D. Susano 37 willful misinterpretation 37 Antheru 37 Lindevaldsen 37 Faretta v. California 37 Judge Huvelle 37 fallacious reasoning 37 scurrilous allegations 36 moral absolutism 36 legally cognizable 36 albeit cordially 36 exonerate Kapoor 36 demonstrably untrue 36 hearsay objection 36 Judge Frans Kgomo 36 overrule Roe 36 Berghuis v. Thompkins 36 absolute certitude 36 Judge Guido Calabresi 36 facially valid 36 inveterate liar 36 Iauko 36 manifest disregard 36 inferentially 36 Justice Christopher Dietzen 36 argumentum ad 36 ex turpi causa 36 Ofshe 36 Ms Syme 36 blatant misrepresentation 36 Appellant contends 36 Judeo Christian morality 36 Judge Doneghy 36 Lidia Stiglich 36 appelate court 36 lawyer Roel Pulido 36 caveatable interest 36 Walter Gerash 36 perpetuates myths 36 c ourts 36 magistrate Kafunda 36 Doug Taffs 36 PASPA 36 rational factfinder 36 procedurally flawed 36 Waidla 36 Kiani Wesson 36 Libby commutation 36 Magistrate Simusamba 36 CALJIC No. #.# 36 alibi witnesses 36 Sankovitz 36 Justice Hickinbottom 36 probative value 36 Crown factum 36 attorney Chet Pleban 36 conclusory assertion 36 prosecutor Satish Borulkar 36 Commissioner Tanner Heaberlin 36 deliberate distortions 36 c ounsel 36 habeas petitioners 36 Mike Antunovic 36 Ralph Gants 36 wholly misconceived 36 baldfaced lies 36 borderline retarded 36 Judge Rakoff 36 Werdegar wrote 36 Drevermann 36 amici briefs 36 inherently untrustworthy 36 Neil Flewitt QC prosecuting 36 foreseeability 36 Judge Peter Lauriat 36 erroneous assumption 36 nondisclosures 36 entirely Maeir 36 frivolous Mulrain 36 Plaintiff asserts 36 DelBigio 36 Aslam Khaki 36 Tajuane Dubose 36 Haklay 36 perjuring themselves 36 Eugene Pigott 36 frivolous vexatious 36 attorney Rhoda Ricciardi 36 D. Castille 36 Reymundo Toledo Flores 36 defendant intervenors 36 savanna hypothesis 36 Regupathi 36 Knizley 36 Patience Drake Roggensack 36 William Gummow 36 Raulinga 36 equitable estoppel 36 Habsburg Lothringen 36 factual inferences 36 factual determinations 36 Betteau 36 Marad massacre 36 adversary proceeding 36 Biancavilla 36 E vidence 36 blatant distortion 36 Defendant contends 36 Robert Lucherini 36 Joseph Nocito 36 unsubstantiated hearsay 36 Klotzes 36 Danilchenko statements 36 d efendants 36 outright untruths 36 Schoenstedt 36 liar liar 36 Gondik 36 Justice Evelyn Lundberg 36 landlord tenant relationship 36 DeShaney 36 posttrial 36 ad hominem fallacy 36 plea colloquy 36 Justice Farkye 36 Glennon Threatt 36 voir dire examination 36 Geoffrey Flick 36 Justice Nyamu 36 Judge Tena Campbell 36 indefiniteness 36 inescapable inference 36 misapprehended 36 premeditated malice 36 Ponvert 36 Justice Jamadar 36 arguable merit 36 Sodomsky 36 Chuck LiMandri 36 false equivalence 36 Bauereiss 36 Justice Randerson 36 sub nom 36 Detective Gescard Isnora 36 unaired portions 36 Gene Fidell 36 justifiable inferences 36 Justice Pathik 36 ruled inadmissable 36 RCr #.# 36 Judge Bonnie Sabraw 36 Judge Judith Bartnoff 36 forcible compulsion 36 shifting rationales 36 ironclad proof 36 imputations 36 False prophets 36 attorney William Costopoulos 36 liberally construe 36 Valken Leduc 36 Sabitt 36 John Coldrey 36 wife Diane Cilento 36 William Costopoulos 36 discriminatory animus 36 habeas petitioner 36 client adamantly denies 36 clergy penitent privilege 36 unwarranted inferences 36 IJ erred 36 Lord Macfadyen 35 heavily lawyered 35 Vample 35 intentional concealment 35 Dr Brincat 35 Supt Halloran 35 specious argument 35 Mrs Crymble 35 Justice Kathryn Werdegar 35 mistake inadvertence surprise 35 counteraffidavit 35 Mrs. Redmond Mercereau 35 Piscevich 35 strident voices 35 reasonable inference 35 counsel performed deficiently 35 dispositive motion 35 merely parroting 35 Tajendra Patel 35 testify untruthfully 35 Angela Antonetti 35 appellants 35 purely circumstantial 35 Bataillon 35 restitutionary 35 constituted willful misconduct 35 circumstancial evidence 35 conclusory allegations 35 spousal privilege 35 Rita Garman 35 manifestly unsupported 35 interlocutory appeal 35 Clifford Lazzaro 35 undue prejudice 35 adverse inferences 35 fringe bigot 35 Judge Osowik 35 separate concurring opinion 35 Shiener 35 Internal quotation marks 35 Sipplen 35 mootness 35 Advertised fares 35 strict constitutionalists 35 Kaunye 35 noncore riskier 35 Baumkel 35 en banc rehearing 35 evidentiary 35 Arnkoff 35 Alhem appeared 35 Tijam 35 appellant contentions 35 Redlightning 35 Zytaruk tape 35 politically motivated witch hunt 35 attorney Joseph Krowski 35 procedurally barred 35 Pedro Irigonegaray 35 cell phones Lanzinger 35 procedural niceties 35 Richard Teitelman 35 Plea bargains 35 Quo Warranto 35 Byabakama 35 Englehart QC 35 Appellants argue 35 Gary Asteak 35 scandalous vexatious 35 Lord Carloway 35 Vigluicci 35 Patricia Broscius 35 DeGuelle 35 prosecutor Mia Magness 35 Assistant Appellate Defender 35 Anthony Besanko 35 reh'g 35 Judge Frank Gaziano 35 Eitan Lehman 35 Norgle 35 Paul Ackourey 35 Bierenbaum 35 Redle 35 § #-#.# [002] 35 unrebutted testimony 35 Appellant argues 35 unnecessarily alarmist 35 Justice Ojwang 35 Legghio 35 Zabidin 35 Ling Cohan 35 Justice Sabhahit 35 Commerce Clause jurisprudence 35 Attorney Gerald Shargel 35 Dannielynn paternity 35 lenity 35 Defendant 35 sophism 35 Ms Wilmshurst 35 specialist Karen Todner 35 recusal motions 35 Darry Hanna 35 attorney Anthony Coppolino 35 instrumentalization 35 Shawn Tundidor 35 denounce Farrakhan 35 Mayercheck 35 Doganiere 35 factual inaccuracy 35 null hypothesis 35 Branzburg 35 uncontradicted evidence 35 Ana M. Jhones 35 Judge Waglay 35 promissory fraud 35 case 35 Neo Darwinism 35 Fybel 35 exculpation 35 Palestinian rejectionism 35 Mileusnic Polchan 35 baselessness 35 legalizing polygamy 35 mere technicalities 35 Plaintiffs Complaint 35 Wyrembek 35 Cary Piel 35 Dr. Joseph Glenmullen 35 strongly worded dissent 35 Originalists 35 court prejudicially erred 35 manifestly untrue 35 Gilbert Nares 35 Whitterson 35 Eric Matwiejczyk 35 Safavian lied 35 Krowski 35 repudiate Farrakhan 35 appellant contends 35 Judge Ingrid Uhler 35 Yustas 35 averments 35 attorney Bruce Barket 35 Doctrinal Note 35 Aca Rayawa 35 homosexual sodomy 35 corroborating witnesses 35 Eleventh Circuits 35 res ipsa 35 Casteleiro 35 defender Marketa Sims 35 Zareh Dear Demir 35 Judge Ewaschuk 35 Irigonegaray 35 Ophoven 35 Appellants assert 35 blatant misrepresentations 35 accusatory instrument 35 Sheik Leghaei 35 behaving irrationally 35 Judge MacBride 35 w hether 35 Clarkson fingernail 35 Hyperlink reference 35 obiter dictum 35 prosecution 35 Liyer wish 35 prosection 35 Faragher Ellerth defense 35 SupremeCourt 35 Psychologist testifies 35 Lithwick 35 bargain Adgate 35 Malarcik 35 Judge Pierre Leval 35 decoupling theory 35 Mr MacSporran 35 recantation 35 blameworthiness 35 Yelenosky 35 potentially hazardous Tribout 35 Tremblay Lamer 35 Churuti 35 NICK MINCHIN Well 35 David Souter dissented 35 Musladin conviction 35 psychologist Kirk Heilbrun 35 factual sufficiency 35 Justice Costa Pleicones 35 customer badgered Doisy 35 Cseripko 35 alarmism 35 mootness doctrine 35 crossexamination 35 mind bogglingly dense 35 Baroness Hale 35 anti SLAPP motions 35 appellants contend 35 USPSTF recommendations 35 Mongeluzzo 35 materialistic worldview 35 rhetorical ruckus 35 Melinda Tempelis 35 instruct juries 35 conclusively establishes 35 Kahgan 34 Thirunama 34 accomplice Joshua Komisarjevsky 34 Mr Justice Ouseley 34 thematter 34 4th DCA 34 overrule Roe v. Wade 34 Nkabinde J 34 attorney Scott Tedmon 34 construed liberally 34 Judge Rosemarie Aquilina 34 suborned perjury 34 Prosecutor Gerrie Nel 34 coram nobis 34 affadavit 34 nonmovant 34 adducing evidence 34 ideological fanaticism 34 averment 34 Donna McGeachy 34 testimonial hearsay 34 cynical opportunism 34 exclusionary rule 34 emotional distress libel slander 34 Munoz Ornelas 34 Mr Tunidau 34 jailhouse snitch 34 untimeliness 34 Bobby Hoof 34 Ronda Lyon 34 Gaime 34 Alprin 34 State ex rel 34 relitigate 34 Judeo Christian worldview 34 Tim Bradl 34 Mrs Koroi 34 sua sponte duty 34 excused juror 34 Assuming arguendo 34 Delgamuukw 34 procedurally defaulted 34 disengenuous 34 Mr Hosemans 34 construal 34 religious dogmatism 34 lengthy dissents 34 Luphondo 34 offbase 34 Bertucio 34 statutory aggravators 34 posttrial motions 34 SLUSA 34 § #C#.# 34 AGW hypothesis 34 soundly debunked 34 ideological claptrap 34 thoughtless remark 34 uncritical acceptance 34 Stephen Adah 34 Sara Buske 34 Judge Eberhard Bertelsmann 34 Pohorelsky 34 habeas relief 34 purely naturalistic 34 attorney Robert Morvillo 34 innocuous travelogue 34 Judge Steeh 34 dispositional orders 34 alarm Limbago 34 plainly erroneous 34 Justice Samuel Awich 34 Michael Morchower 34 Ameshe 34 witness recants 34 Dambruch 34 Phillion alibi 34 lawyer Estelito Mendoza 34 David Brustman SC 34 Nene Amegatcher 34 filmmaker Bob Cesca 34 misrepresentation 34 com plaint 34 deliberate misrepresentation 34 Bazelon 34 Peter Champagnie 34 PVS diagnosis 34 provably false 34 scienter requirement 34 Justice Cowdroy 34 Judge Chinembiri Bhunu 34 Sohrabuddin brother Rubabuddin 34 objectors 34 Moral disapproval 34 wholly unsubstantiated 34 QOTD sent 34 THE ARGUMENTS 34 gross oversimplification 34 Reasonable suspicion 34 Wazhma Mojaddidi 34 Claes Borgstrom lawyer 34 perjurious 34 mother Nixzaliz Santiago 34 willfully misrepresenting 34 reweighing 34 IDers 34 Erick Stachmus 34 deliberate misrepresentations 34 particularized facts 34 knowingly disregarded 34 Venzie 34 Judge Matsch 34 Purnella Simmons 34 advocate Gerrie Nel 34 relitigation 34 moral repugnance 34 Flast v. Cohen 34 notion 34 ResQNet 34 Judge Bertina Lampkin 34 Rao Dheeraj Singh 34 Kirk Kolbo 34 lawyer Jaap Cilliers 34 Jay Ethington 34 Jon Gruden caddying 34 scientifically unfounded 34 Frank Mondano 34 v. Hardwick 34 Judge Zmuda 34 kill Heather Garraus 34 testifiers 34 Segars Andrews 34 BIA erred 34 Gamoian 34 adduce evidence 34 lawyer Daniel Gotlin 34 Third Amended Complaint 34 attorney Billy Rork 34 Demchick Alloy 34 researcher Irving Weissman 34 Fredback 34 Reasonable minds 34 #.# subdivision [004] 34 impute motives 34 supposition 34 Matangos 34 Plaintiffs contend 34 rantings 34 Wizmur 34 Concepcions 34 Rubabuddin 34 preclude summary judgment 34 consequentialist 34 Appellants contend 34 rhetoric 34 Restatement § 34 Demonstrably false 34 Justice Francis Affronti 34 factually incorrect insensitive 34 NIPCC 34 appelate 34 prejudicial publicity 34 reasonable inferences 34 unsupported assertion 34 pre emption doctrine 34 Paliare 34 pro choicer 34 offer Gov. Yuhei 34 Scott Wippert 34 Judge Walter Komanski 34 Maurice LaGrone Junior 34 accuser Crystal Mangum 34 malintent 34 Slaughterhouse Cases 34 reasoned discourse 34 implied malice 34 mistruth 34 preemption doctrine 34 severe insomnia Noelker 34 incriminated himself 34 Sadoff testimony 34 affiant 34 naturalistic explanations 34 driven insecure untruthful 34 pedophile Mesereau 34 Benjamin Sifrit 34 Presentence Report 34 Kathryn Werdegar 34 Gonzales v. Carhart 34 absolute falsehood 34 attorney Rosemary Scapicchio 34 Rigid ideology 34 neo Darwinian evolution 34 UCBR 34 José Baez 34 Judge Bosielo 34 Citizen Petition 34 attorney Anne Beles 34 Memorandum Opinion 34 Peerwani 34 attorney Ron Bamieh 34 interlocutory application 34 Geeker 34 promisor 34 unconstitutional abridgment 34 Denise Calvo 34 grossly oversimplified 34 wishes Seidlin 34 assume arguendo 34 Katzmann 34 Religious fundamentalism 34 derisive remark 34 imputation 34 attorney Franz Zibilich 34 witness Youssef Hmimssa 34 lawyer Daniel Meachum

Back to home page