Related by context. All words. (Click for frequent words.) 76 factual determinations 68 ore tenus 68 evidentiary rulings 66 evidence adduced 65 factual sufficiency 65 UCBR 65 nonmovant 64 reasonable inferences drawn 64 reweigh 64 factfinder 64 reasonable inferences therefrom 63 c ourt 63 Credibility determinations 63 reasonable inferences 62 mootness 62 uncontroverted facts 61 summarily affirm 61 liberally construe 61 mere scintilla 61 summary judgment de novo 61 habeas petitioner 61 reasonable factfinder 61 factual inferences 61 Ibid. 60 interlocutory orders 60 draw reasonable inferences 60 reversible error 60 Appellants argue 60 manifestly unsupported 60 IJ adverse 60 Appellant contends 60 substantive reasonableness 60 affirmance 60 nonmoving party 59 movant 59 contemporaneous objection 59 procedural reasonableness 59 factually distinguishable 59 arbitrability 59 probative value 58 bsent 58 WCJ 58 Younger abstention 58 habeas proceeding 58 vacatur 58 e vidence 57 Faretta motion 57 Appellant asserts 57 remittitur 57 substantive unreasonableness 57 caselaw 57 procedural unconscionability 57 CrR #.# 57 trier 57 CALJIC No. #.# 57 plainly erroneous 57 inferences therefrom 57 C ourt 57 postconviction 57 BIA denial 57 nonfrivolous 57 evidence preponderates 57 reviewed de novo 57 remanding 57 Appellant argues 57 extrinsic evidence 57 IJ erred 57 plainly erred 56 Rule #:#-# [002] 56 sua sponte duty 56 People v. Gardeley 56 argument unpersuasive 56 parental unfitness 56 sua sponte 56 Petitioner contends 56 Defendant contends 56 dispositional order 56 averments 56 REMANDED 56 arguable merit 56 curative instruction 56 Hofsheier 56 OCGA § #-#-# [007] 56 granting summary judgment 56 preclusive effect 56 Evidence Code 56 JNOV motion 56 factual predicate 56 w hether 56 habeas proceedings 56 C ourts 56 Opening Br 56 movants 55 parol evidence 55 Fla. 2d DCA 55 procedurally defective 55 ULJ 55 appellants contend 55 issue preclusion 55 manifestly erroneous 55 4th DCA 55 appellant contentions 55 5th DCA 55 BIA erred 55 Defendant asserts 55 OCGA § #-#-#.# 55 judicial estoppel 55 hereby AFFIRMED 55 Rooker Feldman doctrine 55 precedential value 55 uncontroverted testimony 55 manifest disregard 55 uncontradicted testimony 55 averment 55 mandamus petition 55 § 7B 55 substantively unreasonable 55 Evid. Code § 55 reh'g 55 Claimant argues 55 appellant asserts 55 procedurally barred 55 RC #.# B [001] 55 justiciability 55 Rule #:#-# [001] 55 VACATE 55 untimeliness 54 posttrial motions 54 Rosenkrantz supra 54 fraudulent joinder 54 State ex rel 54 u pon 54 habeas relief 54 Respondent contends 54 factual assertions 54 dispositive 54 REMAND 54 Reply Brief 54 NJRE 54 nonfrivolous issues 54 nondischargeability 54 habeas corpus proceeding 54 improvidently granted 54 appealability 54 uncharged misconduct 54 preclude summary judgment 54 equitable estoppel 54 unanimity instruction 54 voluntariness 54 Plaintiff Complaint 54 justiciable controversy 54 Faretta v. California 54 ref'd 54 uncontradicted 54 appellant 54 mootness doctrine 54 excusable neglect 54 interlocutory appeals 54 NCGS § 7B 54 factual contentions 54 equitable tolling 53 Title VII retaliation 53 fi ndings 53 nontestimonial 53 construing statute 53 Judgment affirmed 53 adjudicating guilt 53 GL c 53 coram nobis 53 quasi judicial proceeding 53 dispositional orders 53 Fed.R.Civ.P. 53 prejudice prong 53 summary judgment motions 53 ex mero motu 53 mistake inadvertence surprise 53 impugned judgment 53 Appellants assert 53 petitioner 53 appellant contends 53 ALJ 53 appealable 53 mandamus proceeding 53 JNOV 53 Appellate Division affirmed 53 JMOL 53 CAFA jurisdiction 53 SOAH 53 § #-#-# [001] 53 respectfully dissent 53 Judge Steven Unpingco 53 La.Civ.Code art 53 ALJ erred 53 drawn therefrom 53 RCr #.# 53 suspensive effect 53 ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED 53 Pitchess motion 53 equitable mootness 53 terminating parental 53 procedural irregularity 52 prima facie case 52 Aplt 52 dism'd 52 thirteenth juror 52 lenity 52 nonfrivolous issue 52 anti SLAPP motions 52 colorable claim 52 adjudicative 52 n othing 52 Code § #-#.# 52 establishes prima facie 52 IJ denial 52 AFFIRMED 52 non justiciable 52 conclusory statements 52 Their Lordships 52 postjudgment 52 NJSA 2A #A 52 Defendant argues 52 conflicting inferences 52 Ahmad Helmy Syed 52 procedurally unreasonable 52 hereby DISMISSED 52 WCAB 52 Sandiganbayan justices 52 § #-#.# [002] 52 § #C#.# 52 mem. op 52 ORS #B.# 52 jurisdictional prerequisite 52 plea colloquy 52 pleadings liberally 52 Elias Zacarias 52 substantive unconscionability 52 functus officio 52 Restatement Second 52 postconviction petition 52 evidentiary 52 reweighing 52 Judicature Act 52 § #-# [001] 52 assuming arguendo 52 pro se litigant 52 reh'g denied 52 n.1 52 controvert 52 habeas statute 52 granted certiorari 52 Appellate Division reversed 52 dicta 52 precedential 52 misapprehended 52 presumptively valid 52 misapprehends 52 justifiable inferences 51 Tenn. R. Civ 51 unexhausted claims 51 nonsuit 51 interlocutory appeal 51 exclusionary rule 51 8 CFR § 51 1st DCA 51 unduly prejudicial 51 unconscionability 51 c ourts 51 claim preclusion 51 prima facia 51 Geier supra 51 order sustaining demurrer 51 overbreadth 51 BPAI 51 CALCRIM No. 51 v. Doolin 51 additur 51 CFR § #.# [006] 51 CALCRIM Nos. 51 ALJs 51 Pa.RAP 51 determinations 51 purposive interpretation 51 § #-#-# [006] 51 al Odah v. 51 Respondent concedes 51 La.Code Crim.P. art 51 People v. Carmony 51 Fla. 3d DCA 51 manifestly unreasonable 51 pleadings 51 sub nom 51 Eleventh Circuit 51 intermediate appellate 51 n.9 51 probative 51 Section #.#.# [001] 51 Code Civ 51 procedurally defaulted 51 factfinding 51 LSA CCP art 51 dispositional hearing 51 nonappealable 51 Judicial Proceedings Article 51 ARS ¤ 51 CrR 51 Collateral estoppel 51 Pitchess discovery 51 People v. Breverman 51 Faretta 51 Presidential Election Petitions 51 KSA #-# d 51 determinations de novo 51 judgment nunc pro 51 dispositive motion 51 Movants 51 presumptively prejudicial 51 Rooker Feldman 51 substantively unconscionable 51 demurrer 51 Plaintiff Motion 51 testimonial hearsay 51 section #.#.# 51 requestor petitioner 50 Mohamad Zabidin 50 Hamdi v. 50 Confrontation Clause 50 knowingly intelligently 50 factual underpinnings 50 nonfinal 50 allocution 50 sufficient indicia 50 n.4 50 v Selsky 50 n.5 50 Iziyon 50 foreseeability 50 instruct sua sponte 50 ZHB 50 Presentence Report 50 Restatement § 50 lodestar method 50 P laintiffs 50 Ex parte Young 50 evidentiary objections 50 proximate causation 50 IC § #-# 50 Eighth Amendment prohibits 50 Melendez Diaz 50 sua sponte dismissal 50 postconviction relief 50 § #c 50 section #-#-# [002] 50 habeas petition 50 Faragher Ellerth defense 50 Spreigl evidence 50 Minn. R. Civ 50 nonobviousness 50 Carpio Morales 50 c ounsel 50 Memorandum Opinion 50 D efendant 50 App'x 50 People v. Falsetta 50 OCGA § #-#-# [004] 50 #.# subdivision [002] 50 justiciable 50 uncontroverted evidence 50 adduce evidence 50 interlocutory judgment 50 postjudgment motion 50 inapplicability 50 alleged contemnor 50 IT IS HEREBY 50 Summary Judgment Order 50 No. #AP 50 Judge Justice Nazhat 50 § #-#-# [008] 50 CALCRIM 50 postconviction motion 50 Wis. Stat 50 deportability 50 colorable 50 affd 50 forum non conveniens 50 Appellant 50 CPLR 50 § #-#-# b [001] 50 reargument 50 § #-#-#.# 50 hereby ORDERED ADJUDGED 50 controverted 50 cognizable 50 per curiam 50 collateral estoppel 50 hearsay objection 50 caveatable interest 50 Basson acquittal 50 § #A.# 50 Rule #:#-# b 50 Saleem Marsoof 50 appellate courts 50 postconviction proceedings 50 v. Quarterman 49 p laintiff 49 summary affirmance 49 factual 49 hereby GRANTED 49 OCGA § #-#-# [008] 49 hereby DENIED 49 OCGA § #-#-# [001] 49 pari materia 49 IRCP 49 contemporaneous objection rule 49 Due Process Clause 49 precluded summary judgment 49 conclusions de novo 49 hearsay testimony 49 Appellants contend 49 nonprecedential 49 liberally construing 49 Justice Jamadar 49 State Farm Mut 49 Minn. Stat 49 Markman Order 49 Civil Procedure Rule 49 RC #.# [002] 49 contemnor 49 WISCONSIN STAT 49 Declaratory Judgment Act 49 § #.# [003] 49 CFR § #.# [005] 49 posttrial 49 counsel performed deficiently 49 b ecause 49 specific articulable facts 49 § #.#.# [001] 49 People v. Waidla 49 ¶ 49 Defendant Motion 49 Delgamuukw 49 Repl. 49 grievant 49 d efendant 49 construed liberally 49 uncontroverted 49 irrebuttable 49 Construing 49 erroneous evidentiary rulings 49 internal citations omitted 49 prosecutrix 49 § #K#.# 49 error coram nobis 49 limine 49 rulings 49 corpus delicti rule 49 KRS #.# [003] 49 fortiori 49 uncharged offenses 49 R. #:#-# 49 Torts § 49 Solicitor Chrissy Adams 49 Roselyne Wendoh 49 purposeful availment 49 Tenth Circuit 49 Manzy W. 49 Hodari D. 49 dispositive procedural ruling 49 conclusory assertions 49 interlocutory 49 En Banc 49 Crim.R. 49 admissibility 49 Civ.R. 49 propria persona 49 CFR § #.# [003] 49 posttrial motion 49 nonjurisdictional 49 neutral decisionmaker 49 conclusory 49 AEDPA 49 appellants 49 constitutionally deficient 49 recusal motion 49 Judge Scheindlin 49 numerosity 49 OCGA § #-#-# [005] 49 v. Mukasey 49 Judges Sonya Sotomayor 49 AR Lakshmanan 49 procedurally err 49 Turner v. Safley 49 permissible inferences 49 Justices CK Thakker 49 internal citation omitted 49 Workers Compensation Appeals 49 judgment 49 comprising Justices P Sathasivam 49 Justice Tariq Parvez 49 Appellants 49 Colo. Sess 48 Armendariz supra 48 quotation omitted 48 Asif Saeed Khosa 48 adducing 48 scienter requirement 48 Al Odah v. 48 en banc 48 aff'd 48 USSG § 48 assume arguendo 48 Ian Farlam 48 summary judgment 48 claimant RFC 48 reasonable trier 48 unpreserved 48 controverting 48 preponderate 48 § #A [002] 48 habeas 48 Ark. R. Civ 48 Justices GP Mathur 48 Idaho Code § 48 modified categorical 48 admissible 48 undue prejudice 48 ADJUDGED 48 Mukundakam Sharma 48 Justice Sabhahit 48 completely counterproductive Haferbeck 48 Appellate Term 48 Justice Kathryn Mickle 48 Hlophe JP 48 CAFC affirmed 48 rational factfinder 48 f ailure 48 internal quotations omitted 48 MR Civ 48 w hen 48 Apprendi 48 2d Dep't 48 Justice Victor Omage 48 appellate court 48 WCJ erred 48 § #b [001] 48 Ex Post Facto 48 precluding summary judgment 48 Defendants Motion 48 FEHA 48 § #-#-# [004] 48 En banc 48 Justice Karwi 48 mens rea requirement 48 granting appellee 48 v Goord 48 Justice Mohd Zabidin 48 Kiobel 48 Plaintiff asserts 48 LIRC 48 Gen. Stat 48 #.# subdivision [004] 48 Shaputis supra 48 NJSA #:#-#.# [003] 48 RC #.# F 48 Petitioner argues 48 postjudgment interest 48 facially neutral 48 ¶ ¶ 48 WITH PREJUDICE 48 Justice Nasirul Mulk 48 jurisdictional defect 48 TCA § #-#-# [003] 48 RC #.# B [002] 48 Mohd Diah 48 Exercising jurisdiction 48 n otwithstanding 48 Intervenors 48 sub silentio 48 Justice HK Sema 48 Charge Contempt 48 Petitioner 48 Govendo 48 granted summary judgment 48 hero Kastigar 48 Case No. A#A# 48 INS v. 48 corpus delicti 48 Justices SB Sinha 48 arbitrable 48 Almendarez Torres 48 appealable judgment 48 factually insufficient 48 People v. Doganiere 48 contemnors 48 section #-#-# [003] 48 preliminary injunctive relief 48 Judgments § 48 Trustee Objection 48 particularity requirement 48 Cal. Rules 48 arbitral tribunal 48 Defendant Scrushy 48 joinder 48 § #-#-# [002] 48 counterclaims asserted 48 conclusory allegation 48 App.R. 48 Werdegar wrote 48 attained finality 48 La. Code Civ 48 bindover 48 u nless 48 laches 48 quoting Twombly 47 unliquidated damages 47 Gall v. 47 Justice PK Bhasin 47 obiter dictum 47 particularized facts 47 Aruna Suresh 47 liberally construed 47 statutory aggravators 47 unexhausted 47 n.2 47 Herb Weitzel 47 court prejudicially erred 47 temporal proximity 47 Justice Wowo 47 restitutionary 47 S ection 47 obiter 47 Probate Code 47 Board ASLB 47 writ petitioners 47 KSA #-# [002] 47 Xiu Xia Lin 47 adduced 47 mandamus 47 severability provision 47 ORS #.# [001] 47 inadmissible hearsay 47 ponencia 47 estoppel 47 competent evidential 47 Justice PP Naolekar 47 Tennard 47 JUSTICE BREYER 47 USC § #e 47 JUSTICE STEVENS 47 § #-# [004] 47 ResQNet 47 Grutter v. Bollinger 47 SLUSA 47 conclusory assertion 47 conclusory allegations 47 admissability 47 Court. Judgment 47 n.3 47 Judge Zmuda 47 mitigating circumstances 47 Code § #.#-# [001] 47 Hon'ble Supreme Court 47 accusatory instrument 47 b Vernon Supp 47 Adarand 47 manifestly unjust 47 appelate court 47 corroborative evidence 47 evident partiality 47 factual predicates 47 lawmaker Hosseini Sobhaninia 47 juvenile adjudications 47 triable 47 audi alteram partem 47 Shariat Appellate Bench 47 § #B#.# [002] 47 summary judgment motion 47 mitigating circumstance 47 Eleventh Circuits 47 articulable facts 47 incurably defective 47 DEFENSE COUNSEL 47 Claimant contends 47 IT IS ORDERED 47 articulable 47 USCA § 47 Suspension Clause 47 § #A#.# 47 multiplicitous 47 #.# subd [006] 47 Associate Justices Consuelo Ynares 47 equitably estopped 47 Scheduling Order 47 Tikka Iqbal 47 aggravators 47 De Varon 47 court procedurally erred 47 § #e 47 Third Amended Complaint 47 § #A [001] 47 reasonably arguable 47 Petitioners contend 47 lv dismissed 47 fact finder 47 overrule appellant 47 Schneckloth v. Bustamonte 47 Martin Villarama 47 rational trier 47 antenuptial agreement 47 facially invalid 47 Richard Orfinger 47 Plaintiffs Complaint 47 Double Jeopardy Clause 47 amparo petition 47 #-# SDNY 47 No. B# 47 pendente lite 47 Appellate Procedure 47 RCW #.#A.# 47 anti SLAPP motion 47 Justice Kafarati 47 substantively reasonable 47 subsection h 47 judge Hamaundu 47 Fam. Code § 47 CUTPA 47 Christopher Speyer 47 Khalilur Rehman Ramday 47 Plaintiffs Appellants 47 Civil Procedure section 47 hereby ORDERED 47 Even assuming arguendo 47 Judge Thelma Bunyi 47 § #-#-# [003] 47 SCR #:#.# [001] 47 NJSA 2A :# 47 Assuming arguendo 47 Nik Hashim 47 3d Dept 47 NYCRR #.# [001] 47 Justice Mohamad Zabidin 47 AM Thipsay 47 preclusion 47 affiant 47 rev'd 47 Nkabinde J 47 Second Amended Complaint 47 v. Cavera 47 PS § 47 Justice Babs Kuewumi 47 parol evidence rule 47 Reasonable suspicion 47 n.6 47 CK Thakker 47 § 7A 47 e xcept 47 ripeness doctrine 47 Justice Umar Ata 47 promissory fraud 47 '# patent invalid 47 Minn. R. Crim 47 Bilal Nazki 47 motu propio 47 unrebutted evidence 47 DC Code § 47 Abe Motala 47 Datuk Zaharah Ibrahim 46 ARS § #-# [001] 46 courtâ € ™ 46 quasi judicial body 46 HCJ 46 defendant waives 46 e ach 46 Limine 46 Evid. Code § § 46 Carmony supra 46 forma pauperis 46 § #E#.# 46 2d Dept 46 Leonard Njagi 46 Jian Hui Shao 46 Dennis M. Perluss 46 #.# subds [001] 46 s uch 46 No. #CA# [002] 46 Evid 46 unappealable 46 Zabidin Mohd Diah 46 Wallace Hoggatt 46 Ark. R. Crim 46 Shaputis 46 Amjad Sayed 46 triable issue 46 § #.# [001] 46 FSIA 46 SE2d 46 Lenix supra 46 inculpatory 46 Berghuis v. Thompkins 46 SUITS FILED Circuit 46 NJSA #:#-# [002] 46 tunc 46 section #.#b 46 § #-# [002] 46 Pa.CSA § 46 inapplicable 46 Justice Abdullahi Mustapha 46 § #-#-# [005] 46 habeas petitioners 46 Johnson v. Eisentrager 46 USSG § #D#.# 46 Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Mohd 46 Sixth Circuit 46 unpatentability 46 rebuttable 46 nonstatutory 46 demurrers 46 Reinholtsen 46 justices P Sathasivam 46 Undisputed Facts 46 Gary Hickinbottom 46 magistrate Kafunda 46 adjudicatory hearing 46 AS #.#.# 46 subsections b 46 nonjusticiable 46 PERB 46 Justice Lakshmanan 46 La.Code Civ.P. art 46 REVERSED 46 Defendants Motions 46 Bankruptcy Procedure 46 re LYL 46 AND ADJUDGED 46 E vidence 46 Doc. # 46 Conchita Carpio Morales 46 section #A.# [002] 46 CPLR article 46 xxxi adverse tax 46 Pa.CS § 46 res gestae 46 Tafas v. Doll 46 construing 46 Daubert v. 46 amendatory statute 46 Mr. Narmont 46 gross disproportionality 46 PK Bhasin 46 prima facie 46 pretermitted 46 Minn. R. Evid 46 Doganiere 46 reasonably deduce 46 uncharged misconduct evidence 46 Mohammad Munir Paracha 46 Ninth Circuit 46 strictly construe 46 Tennessee Code Annotated 46 duly constituted 46 Wyo. Stat 46 Penson v. 46 Evidentiary 46 L.Ed. 2d 46 Order Granting 46 n.7 46 jus cogens 46 arbitral award 46 evidential burden 46 P laintiff 46 Paul Luckern 46 Justice Egbo Egbo 46 HRS § #-# [001] 46 replead 46 objectively determinable 46 ICWA notice 46 Justice Surya Kant 46 preponderance 46 USC § #u 46 Anwar Zaheer Jamali 46 unduly prejudiced 46 KSR v. Teleflex 46 Datuk Ahmad Maarop 46 Judge Diarmuid F. 46 Evid.R. 46 certiorari 46 § #-# [003] 46 Justice Mohd Zaki 46 Lokeshwar Singh Panta 46 impliedly 46 subsection f 46 CPLR § 46 Justices Aftab Alam 46 Justices P. Sathasivam 46 Martin Villarama Jr. 46 Riegel v. 46 CFR § #.# [004] 46 controverting evidence 46 verdict JNOV 46 p rior 46 Boykin Tahl 46 construe statutes 46 coram nobis relief 46 amici 46 UK Ltd. Warnford 46 vagueness doctrine 46 Interlocutory 46 Strickland supra 46 Polygraph examinations 46 peremptory writ 46 Justices RV Raveendran 46 movant establishes 46 § #a [002] 46 objectively verifiable 46 No. #CA# M 46 voire dire 46 Dissenting Opinion 46 Justice Abimbola Ogie 46 v. INS 46 VSA § 46 accused infringer 46 unreasonableness 46 e ven 46 evidentiary hearing 46 reasonableness 45 en banc rehearing 45 compulsory counterclaim 45 preponderates 45 Justice Cowdroy 45 w hile 45 permissibly 45 rehearing en banc 45 Justice Opene 45 Datuk Abdull Hamid Embong 45 Id. 45 Justice Cyriac Joseph 45 § #.# [002] 45 P Sathasivam 45 adjudicative functions 45 indefiniteness 45 Justice Md Raus 45 PK Balasubramanyam 45 condemnor 45 grandparent visitation 45 Justice Farkye 45 NDCC § 45 § #.# [005] 45 procedurally flawed 45 punctuation omitted 45 Bell v. Wolfish 45 NJSA 2C :# 1a 45 i fa 45 Bedkes 45 L.Ed.2d 45 UIFSA 45 KSA #-# [001] 45 THE COURT 45 LSA RS #:# [002] 45 Initial Determination 45 MSPB 45 advocate Viplav Sharma 45 Appellate Courts 45 Allvoice 45 Manila RTC 45 ASLB 45 CRCP 45 HK Sema 45 F ailure 45 ex rel 45 Mridula Bhatkar 45 OAH 45 Ling Cohan 45 Justice Shameem 45 claimant 45 Dkt. # 45 Tex. R. 45 Mandamus 45 Slip op 45 adjudication 45 constitutes patentable 45 prosecution laches 45 Judge Dyk 45 Bhangale 45 affiants 45 Franchise Tax Bd 45 Petitioner asserts 45 § #K#.# b 45 manifest injustice 45 impute guilt Rudolph 45 USC § 45 particularized 45 Bench comprising Justice Arijit 45 Kucana 45 P. Sathasivam 45 Pitchess v. 45 § #.# b 45 aggravator 45 Makati RTC Branch 45 Docket Nos. 45 pp. #-# fn