Related by context. All words. (Click for frequent words.) 70 plea allocution 68 allocution 66 Defendant argues 65 knowingly intelligently 65 RCr #.# 65 uncharged misconduct 64 Appellant argues 64 postconviction motion 64 inculpatory 64 contemporaneous objection 63 parol evidence 63 Spreigl evidence 63 Defendant asserts 63 postconviction petition 63 postconviction 63 CALJIC No. #.# 63 Faretta motion 63 procedurally unreasonable 62 reversible error 62 prejudice prong 62 postconviction counsel 62 unanimity instruction 62 substantively unreasonable 62 Faretta 62 uncontradicted testimony 62 habeas proceeding 62 Presentence Investigation Report 62 Defendant contends 62 procedurally barred 62 appellant 61 postconviction relief 61 voir dire examination 61 nolo contendere plea 61 Presentence Report 61 curative instruction 61 voluntariness 61 nontestimonial 61 evidentiary rulings 61 Opening Br 61 postrelease control 61 Appellant contends 60 factual sufficiency 60 unduly prejudicial 60 hearsay objection 60 Confrontation Clause 60 Appellant asserts 60 Defendant 60 CrR #.# 60 Appellant 60 extrinsic evidence 60 liberally construe 60 factually distinguishable 60 procedurally defaulted 60 appellants contend 59 ore tenus 59 nondischargeability 59 uncharged misconduct evidence 59 nonfrivolous 59 e vidence 59 appellant asserts 59 presentence report 59 Mr. Narmont 59 Pitchess motion 59 sua sponte duty 59 plainly erred 59 substantive reasonableness 59 Younger abstention 59 c ounsel 59 habeas relief 59 factual determinations 59 AEDPA 59 d efendant 59 proximate causation 59 procedural reasonableness 58 D efendant 58 Evid. Code § 58 § #-#.# [002] 58 Fla. 2d DCA 58 HGN test 58 voire dire 58 arguable merit 58 voir dire 58 section #.#.# 58 NJRE 58 CALCRIM No. 58 factual predicate 58 disclose exculpatory evidence 58 affiants 58 equitable tolling 58 c ourt 58 habeas proceedings 58 uncontroverted facts 58 Refowich 58 Ibid. 58 postconviction proceedings 58 particularity requirement 58 limine 58 Movant 58 Saranchak 58 posttrial 57 Crim.R. 57 affiant 57 Evidence Code 57 sua sponte 57 psychosexual evaluation 57 Plaintiff Complaint 57 § #.#.# [001] 57 res gestae 57 d efendants 57 habeas petitioner 57 presentence investigation 57 crossexamination 57 IJ erred 57 defendant 57 La.Code Crim.P. art 57 Petitioner contends 57 JNOV motion 57 appellant contends 57 inculpatory statements 57 Appellants argue 57 Pa.RAP 57 instruct sua sponte 56 reasonable factfinder 56 counsel performed deficiently 56 BIA erred 56 ULJ 56 assuming arguendo 56 modified categorical 56 La.Civ.Code art 56 Boykin Tahl 56 promissory fraud 56 Assuming arguendo 56 movant 56 constitutionally deficient 56 5th DCA 56 movants 56 colloquy 56 Assistant Appellate Defender 56 presumptively prejudicial 56 § #B#.# [001] 56 interrogatory answers 56 conclusory assertion 56 Kestenband 56 reasonable inferences drawn 56 Hofsheier 56 inadmissible hearsay 56 substantive unreasonableness 56 4th DCA 56 controverting evidence 56 caselaw 56 IC § #-# 56 evidence adduced 55 Respondent concedes 55 uncharged offenses 55 procedural unconscionability 55 Rule #-# 55 argument unpersuasive 55 Armengau 55 posttrial motion 55 juvenile adjudications 55 bifurcated proceeding 55 nonfrivolous issue 55 lenity 55 Evid.R. 55 habeas petition 55 summarily affirm 55 p rior 55 Rooker Feldman doctrine 55 predicate acts 55 testimonial hearsay 55 Rule #:#-# [002] 55 Plaintiff asserts 55 Wis. Stat 55 Judge Zmuda 55 substantively reasonable 55 § #A [002] 55 Reinholtsen 55 w hether 55 § #C#.# 55 judicial estoppel 55 unrebutted testimony 55 adjudicating guilt 55 uncontradicted 55 factual underpinnings 55 Movants 55 accused infringer 55 GL c 55 habeas corpus proceeding 54 untimeliness 54 section #-#-# [002] 54 appealability 54 reasonably arguable 54 CALCRIM 54 vacatur 54 Section #.#.# [001] 54 pleadings 54 recross examination 54 court prejudicially erred 54 Urdangen 54 State ex rel 54 § #-# [001] 54 La.Code Civ.P. art 54 propria persona 54 evidentiary hearing 54 OCGA § #-#-# [001] 54 mandamus petition 54 Appellants 54 nol pros 54 Sixth Amendment 54 probative 54 Code § #.#-# [001] 54 ALJ erred 54 sufficient particularity 54 WCJ 54 RCW #.#A.# 54 Minn. R. Civ 54 Double Jeopardy Clause 54 mens rea 54 factual assertions 54 appellants 54 postjudgment motion 54 § #A [001] 54 Zonay 54 bindover 54 foreseeability 54 RC #.# [002] 54 pro se litigant 54 appellant contentions 54 KSA #-# [001] 54 Petitioner 54 overbreadth 54 controverting 54 evidentiary objections 54 Respondent contends 54 constituted willful misconduct 54 corpus delicti rule 54 requestor petitioner 54 p laintiff 53 Leinenweber 53 mootness doctrine 53 CALCRIM Nos. 53 presentencing investigation 53 antenuptial agreement 53 c ourts 53 juror questionnaire 53 OCGA § #-#-# [004] 53 preclude summary judgment 53 mere scintilla 53 w hen 53 Minn. R. Crim 53 Gamez Acuna 53 Pa.CS § 53 PCRA petition 53 instruct jurors 53 raise triable 53 error coram nobis 53 Judge Ingrid Uhler 53 Title VII retaliation 53 admissible 53 Ark. R. Civ 53 issue preclusion 53 OCGA § #-#-# [008] 53 declarants 53 Rossanese 53 presentence 53 OCGA § #-#-# [007] 53 Aplt 53 KSA #-# [002] 53 Fed.R.Civ.P. 53 Wyo. Stat 53 averment 53 indigency 53 facially valid 53 Id. 53 purposeful availment 53 Judge Gless 53 excusable neglect 53 rational factfinder 53 prosecutorial vindictiveness 53 RCW #.#.# [004] 53 equitable estoppel 53 Maybrown 53 e ach 53 Colorado Revised Statutes 53 Civ.R. 53 Polachek Gartley 52 posttrial motions 52 Even assuming arguendo 52 Respondent 52 Rule #:#-# [001] 52 Kopcow 52 DeVesa 52 Fifth Amendment privilege 52 involuntary intoxication 52 draw reasonable inferences 52 La. Code Civ 52 Suntag 52 USSG § #C#.# 52 conclusory 52 appellees 52 § #B#.# [002] 52 contributorily negligent 52 subsection d 52 nolle 52 scrivener error 52 mootness 52 RC #.# B [002] 52 construing statute 52 Plaintiff 52 probative value 52 Fla. 3d DCA 52 Judge Doneghy 52 conclusory statements 52 interrogatory responses 52 bindover hearing 52 dispositive motion 52 assume arguendo 52 credibility determinations 52 Mr Sofronoff 52 mistake inadvertence surprise 52 court procedurally erred 52 Judge Mosby Perrow 52 Petitioner asserts 52 claim preclusion 52 recusal motion 52 Zansberg 52 Doganiere 52 sufficient indicia 52 SVPA 52 Judge Waglay 52 factfinder 52 sanctionable conduct 52 depraved indifference murder 52 rearraignment 52 conclusory allegations 52 liquidated damages provision 52 Superseding Indictment 51 exculpatory 51 RCW #A.#.# [002] 51 b ecause 51 Ex Post Facto 51 Pen. Code § #.# [001] 51 WISCONSIN STAT 51 nonsuit 51 postconviction proceeding 51 Judge Lokuta 51 Reyat lied 51 Solovan 51 OCGA § #-#-# [005] 51 dispositional hearing 51 #.# subdivision [002] 51 responsive pleadings 51 Plea Agreement 51 adduce evidence 51 aggravator 51 Defendant Scrushy 51 uncontroverted testimony 51 surrebuttal 51 Grunander 51 Gen. Stat 51 Plaintiff contends 51 D efendants 51 Judge Peter Lauriat 51 Judge Osowik 51 CrR 51 interlocutory appeal 51 Apprendi 51 Minn. R. Evid 51 alleged contemnor 51 subsection b 51 Rule #:#-# b 51 nonfrivolous issues 51 lodestar method 51 constituted inadmissible hearsay 51 parol evidence rule 51 testifying truthfully 51 Defendant pled guilty 51 Judge Thomas Zonay 51 Minn. Stat 51 coram nobis relief 51 § #B#.# b 51 mens rea requirement 51 Judge Garaufis 51 presentencing 51 Polygraph examinations 51 Miranda warnings 51 prosecutorial impropriety 51 Tennard 51 Alford Doctrine 51 declarant 51 n.5 51 fraudulent joinder 51 Judge Krichbaum 51 C ounsel 51 n othing 51 Marschewski 51 affirmative defenses 51 ALJ 51 § #G#.# 51 postjudgment 51 precluded summary judgment 51 plainly erroneous 51 OCGA § #-#-#.# 51 incriminated himself 51 Von Zamft 51 probation revocation 51 Jazgar 51 Merino Apolinar 51 ref'd 51 Amended Complaint 51 Joseph Damelio 51 Justice Farkye 51 Voir dire 51 Mangerson 51 dicta 51 Tex. Code 51 CSRT panels 51 § #A#.# 51 Defendants 50 n.1 50 PCRA hearings 50 Dunphy Farris 50 Sentencing Guidelines Manual 50 nunc pro tunc 50 KRS #.# [002] 50 pleadings liberally 50 Ayerdi 50 procedurally defective 50 ¶ 50 quasi judicial proceeding 50 #.# subd [002] 50 ¶ ¶ 50 resentencing 50 De Varon 50 negligent entrustment 50 Amended Judgment 50 RC #.# B [001] 50 objectively unreasonable 50 Carmen W. Picknally 50 judgment nunc pro 50 USSG § #G#.# 50 Cadish 50 potentially exculpatory 50 implied malice 50 knowingly possessed 50 hearsay testimony 50 Sprind 50 section #.#b 50 Alford Plea 50 Wende supra 50 Judge Muroski 50 dispositive motions 50 factual contentions 50 FEHA 50 requisite mens rea 50 forcible compulsion 50 facially invalid 50 MR Civ 50 Broscius 50 inapposite 50 RCr 50 attorney Howard Ehring 50 § #.# subd [005] 50 State Farm Mut 50 undergo psychosexual evaluation 50 Justice Randerson 50 unexhausted 50 LSA CCP art 50 Eleventh Circuit 50 adduce sufficient 50 evidentiary 50 § #K#.# b 50 interrogatory 50 pled nolo contendere 50 Naraja 50 compulsory counterclaim 50 parental unfitness 50 stenographic notes 50 Collateral estoppel 50 Tenn. R. Civ 50 deponent 50 Sara Buske 50 relator 50 prosecutor Linda Drane 50 USSG § #D#.# 50 uncontroverted 50 SORNA 50 controvert 50 reh'g 50 No. #CA# [002] 50 Pregerson 50 § #L#.# 50 internal citations omitted 50 Third Amended Complaint 50 willful deliberate 50 Judge Tatel 50 Appellants assert 50 affidavits depositions 50 uncontroverted evidence 50 Due Process Clause 50 ex parte communication 50 v. Heckler 50 Judge Claudia Laycock 50 accusatory pleading 50 KSA #-# d 50 answered Yes sir 50 Redlightning 50 Faretta v. California 50 judge withheld adjudication 50 cross examination 50 Judge Larry Smukler 50 probable cause 50 errata sheet 50 quotation omitted 50 Lawyer Mboge 50 Prospective Juror No. 50 Munkelt 50 Jarrett Ferentino 50 averments 50 n.4 50 § #.# [003] 50 Judge Marcelo Kopcow 50 Pitchess discovery 50 coram nobis 50 presentence credits 50 Delehey 50 Plaintiffs Complaint 49 Scotillo 49 Ahto 49 reviewed de novo 49 § #-#.# [003] 49 JNOV 49 Claimant contends 49 custodial interrogation 49 reindict 49 RC #.# F 49 USSG § #E#.# 49 mens rea element 49 ordered presentence investigation 49 particularized facts 49 withhold adjudication 49 multiplicitous 49 Bertani Tomczak 49 purely circumstantial 49 Bucklo 49 testimony 49 UCBR 49 Vinegrad 49 Matangos 49 VACATE 49 laches 49 Petitioners contend 49 Proximate cause 49 De la Rionda 49 OCGA § #-#-# [003] 49 IJ adverse 49 Judge Augello 49 nolle prossed 49 spontaneous utterance 49 DWI conviction 49 Domalakes 49 Subsection c 49 misapprehends 49 Judge Benotto 49 § #E#.# 49 Leyte Vidal 49 USSG § #K#.# b 49 Judge Zloch 49 Furfure 49 f ailure 49 withheld adjudication 49 Mellaci 49 spousal privilege 49 Judge Geroulo 49 Appellees 49 particularised 49 Code § #.#-#.# [001] 49 Scheduling Order 49 permissibly 49 section #.# 49 La. RS #:# [003] 49 Mr. McClenehan 49 Ark. Sup 49 respectfully dissent 49 § #-#-# [001] 49 n.9 49 E vidence 49 People v. Gardeley 49 Code § #.#-# [003] 49 CAFA jurisdiction 49 Code § #-#.# 49 remittitur 49 exculpatory evidence 49 Judge Thomas Marcelain 49 People v. Wende 49 codefendant 49 bsent 49 nonmovant 49 Reply Brief 49 González Vélez 49 v. Quarterman 49 articulable suspicion 49 interlocutory appeals 49 App.R. 49 subsection c 49 Reasonable suspicion 49 Davila Colon 49 firearm Pen. Code § 49 Rompilla 49 mem. op 49 USSG § #B#.# [002] 49 #.# subds [001] 49 predicate offenses 49 McDonald Burkman 49 mental incompetency 49 DEFENSE COUNSEL 49 SCR #:#.# [001] 49 Code § #.#-#.# [002] 49 Ferencek 49 Construing 49 sua sponte dismissal 49 ORS #.# [001] 49 Nicarico murder 49 Tennessee Code Annotated 49 Niemoczynski 49 Restatement § 49 Bill Kutmus 49 limine motions 49 Judge Diane Druzinski 49 requested continuance 49 Aggravated manslaughter 49 Plaintiff alleges 49 conclusively establishes 49 Judge Sawako Gardner 49 Second Amended Complaint 49 unliquidated damages 49 USSG § 49 John E. Blahovec 49 presentence custody 49 Matwiejczyk 49 corpus delicti 49 pro se 49 Shepack 49 petitioner 49 promisor 49 perjure himself 49 unsworn testimony 49 Ballarotto 49 Anders v. 49 Ark. R. Crim 49 Carolyn Schlemmer 49 polygraph examination 49 Zelechiwsky 49 Marcelain 49 Wepsiec 49 wrongfulness 49 postrelease supervision 49 particularized 49 NJSA #:#-# [002] 49 Appellants contend 49 SSOSA 48 Tenth Circuit 48 § #B 48 Sandra Doorley 48 Gorham Bey 48 Zwillman 48 Intervenors 48 Kutmus 48 P laintiff 48 perjurious testimony 48 prosecutor Robert Ilat 48 alibi witnesses 48 Eagloski 48 Rooker Feldman 48 quantum meruit 48 Ms Aikins 48 section #A.# [002] 48 temporal proximity 48 jury foreperson 48 ORS #B.# 48 pro hac vice 48 grievant 48 interrogatories 48 La.RS #:#.# [001] 48 Judge Prokes 48 Baylson 48 Irenas 48 Whiteko 48 Shaputis 48 replied Yes ma'am 48 § #K#.# 48 Magistrate Judge Pamela Mathy 48 legitimate penological interests 48 Petitioner argues 48 Kalokathis 48 section #-#-# [003] 48 Vodochodsky 48 attorney Jeffrey Jakmides 48 articulable 48 Kirk V. Leidy 48 § #-# [004] 48 NSL statutes 48 estoppel certificate 48 Sentencing Guidelines Manual USSG 48 attorney Brick Storts 48 competency evaluations 48 Dassey confession 48 KSA #-# b 48 dispositional order 48 defendant waives 48 People v. Doganiere 48 dispositive 48 Penal Code Sec 48 s uch 48 Mary Lou Rup 48 n.2 48 Govendo 48 polygraph exam 48 Breen acted unethically 48 Davick Halfen 48 Drukteinis 48 WCJ erred 48 Okla. Stat 48 IIRIRA 48 David Suntag 48 percipient witnesses 48 uncontradicted evidence 48 contemporaneous documentation 48 Fetky 48 ARS § 48 Midanik 48 SLUSA 48 USv 48 mandamus proceeding 48 Bozonelis 48 conclusory allegation 48 Justice Whealy 48 Melendez Diaz 48 per curiam 48 Evid 48 § #-#-# [002] 48 n.7 48 internal quotation omitted 48 Their Lordships 48 Adversary Complaint 48 Eckiss 48 additur 48 u nless 48 JQC 48 misogynist Pingelton 48 intentional relinquishment 48 Judge Nordheimer 48 Magistrate Judge Peggy Leen 48 unwarned 48 arbitrability 48 readily provable 48 Internal quotation marks 48 #-# citations omitted 48 collateral estoppel 48 unsworn statement 48 nonprecedential 48 OCGA § #-#-# [002] 48 appealable interlocutory 48 extenuating factors 48 forma pauperis 48 P laintiffs 48 Joseph Sanzone 48 Code Civ 48 BIA denial 48 Judge Deborah Bernini 48 PW1 48 Joseph Nocito 48 Judge George Bakalis 48 adversarial proceeding 48 Steve P. Leskinen 48 Gembic 48 internal citation omitted 48 USSG § #B#.# b 48 adjudicatory hearing 48 unsworn 48 THE COURT 48 Casteleiro 48 TCA § #-#-# [001] 48 § #-#-# [008] 48 Exigent circumstances 48 Hrvol 48 Magistrate Judge Ann Vitunac 48 Eleventh Circuits 48 § #-#-#.# 48 promissory estoppel claim 48 Idaho Code § 48 La.RS #:# [003] 48 intoxilyzer test 48 Vic Puran 48 Punitive damages penalize 48 NRS #.# [001] 48 Weinhoeft 48 Perdock 48 § 7B 48 appellee 48 Affiant 48 jurisdictional prerequisite 48 NCGS § 7B 48 § #A [003] 48 Judge Manck 48 u pon 48 impermissibly vague 48 Defendant Motion 48 Phyllis Lemons 48 minitrial 48 u nder 48 Judge Maraman 48 Applicant contends 48 statutorily authorized 48 Weissman conspired 47 accusatory instrument 47 Judge Andrew Nastoff 47 USSG § #B#.# [001] 47 Arlan Briggs 47 Debtor 47 Judge Zouhary 47 Mr Bellanto 47 Madenspacher 47 dkt item 47 Binalshibh interrogation 47 peremptory writ 47 Evid. Code § § 47 justiciable controversy 47 Kayfetz 47 scienter requirement 47 Arkansas Code Annotated 47 § #-# [002] 47 adducing evidence 47 Judge Bosielo 47 preliminary hearing 47 Swanum 47 Justice Panckhurst 47 Alford Doctrine meaning 47 reasonable inferences therefrom 47 § #-#-# [003] 47 Luetscher 47 RSA #:# [001] 47 facially insufficient 47 Paul Ackourey 47 Adversary Proceeding 47 Dkt. # 47 v. Allstate Ins 47 requisite scienter 47 Judge Diane Kottmyer 47 § #L#.# b 47 Nila Robinson 47 Judge Czajka 47 § #A.# 47 Class Period Defendants 47 Vigluicci 47 Nebush 47 Voluntary Manslaughter 47 forcible felony 47 v. Astrue 47 controverted 47 n.3 47 legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons 47 admissibility 47 v. Apfel 47 Judge Andrew Ceresia 47 Lindemeier 47 nolo contendere 47 Pozonsky 47 Liell 47 percipient witness 47 IRCP 47 i fa 47 sub nom 47 equitable subrogation 47 Larry Basford 47 liberally construing 47 Dkt. 47 NYCHRL 47 Gov't Br 47 Scott Drabenstadt 47 Geeker 47 Interrogatory No. 47 dischargeability 47 preclusive effect 47 liquidated damages clause 47 Magistrate Judge Harwell 47 VanderSchoor 47 habitual offender enhancement 47 Cunan 47 legitimate nondiscriminatory reason 47 expunction 47 Craig Manford 47 #.# subdivision [004] 47 w ithout 47 § #-# [003] 47 unexhausted claims 47 Magidson Merel 47 Reaffirmation Agreement 47 CPLR 47 1st DCA 47 USSG § #A#.# b 47 Dr Arrigo 47 § #.# b 47 § #-#-# [007] 47 colorable claim 47 internal quotations omitted 47 appealable judgment 47 Clare Keithley 47 First Amended Complaint 47 Solicitor Chrissy Adams 47 § #-#-# [006] 47 substantive unconscionability 47 Justice Christopher Dietzen 47 Hodari D. 47 summary judgment motions 47 g iven 47 equitably tolled 47 habeas statute 47 Allendoerfer 47 reasonable trier 47 summary judgment motion 47 Appellant Br 47 contemporaneous objection rule 47 manifestly unsupported 47 id. 47 CFR § #.# [005] 47 testified truthfully 47 Ameshe 47 Plaintiffs assert 47 habeas 47 RCW #.#.# [002] 47 CFR § #.# [007] 47 admissable 47 guilty plea 47 objectively verifiable facts 47 probated sentence 47 ARS § #-# [002] 47 Judge Henrik Tonning 47 Alford pleas 47 Wilzbach 47 Judge Conrad Sindt 47 rebuttable 47 presentencing report 47 Sargus 47 CPLR article 47 warrant affidavit 47 Judge Steven Unpingco 47 jurisdictional defect 47 procedurally err 47 unadjudicated 47 Bankr. SD Ohio 47 misapplies 47 tortious conduct 47 § #D#.# 47 Sonnega 47 Camblos 47 DiScenza 47 L.Ed.2d 47 H. Dohn 47 Appellate Procedure 47 Branzburg 47 inculpatory evidence 47 Investigative Subcommittee 47 § #e 47 Judge Stephen Abany 47 extraneous prejudicial 47 Judge Bruce Romanick 47 sole proximate cause 47 USI hereafter becomes 47 willfully obstructed 47 ZHB 47 Amended Petition 47 aggravators 47 continuances 47 Belgau 47 Prosecutor Jeffery Strelzin 47 Treppiedi 47 corruptly persuade 47 Probation revocation 47 Hlophe JP 47 Sloviter 47 Judge Finnane 47 triable 46 rebuttal witness 46 premeditated malice 46 causation 46 Tuminelli 46 conclusory assertions 46 Eighth Amendments 46 Polozola 46 unrebutted evidence 46 particularized suspicion 46 Justice Jamadar 46 OCCA 46 Wymard 46 NJSA 2A #A 46 lawyer Eddie Parladorio 46 obviousness rejection 46 Repl.