Comment 063

next comment

Tags: * poor ARR meta/review quality * improve matching * reviewer management too aggressive

"1) The quality of ARR reviews I received has been atrocious -- unhelpful, uninformative, often showing 
the reviewers are unfamiliar with the paper subject. The paper assignment needs to improve. Tracks could 
be a way to achieve this. 2) The overly aggressive review assignment discouraged me from reviewing -- 
I rather opt out than receive papers over my set limit, with extremely tight deadlines."