Comment 229

next comment

Tags: * for anonymous open review * force senior people to review * for authors as mandatory reviewers

"We should give serious consideration to anonymous open review. It's unclear why this isn't even on 
the table. Folks who submit papers should be reviewing. And I don't just mean the most junior person 
on the paper. If a paper doesn't have X% of their authors reviewing for that cycle, their paper should 
not be reviewed. "